The Archives

Browse the content below to find what you're looking for.

So Facebook added Location. What’s next? Location Based Services for marketers 101

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Location-enabled social networks are not new. As a matter of fact, there are more than 100 companies providing some type of social networking with location features. Some of them have been integrated with Facebook for a long time. So why are these changes important for marketers and business developers?
Read More

Indoor Navigation: The new Gold rush? Part-2 – Ecosystem and opportunities.

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Is Indoor navigation a viable business? What are the main business factors that will determine the broad adoption and success of indoor navigation solutions?

A few months ago I wrote an introduction about the opportunities in indoor navigation. Please read the comments as every single one adds an additional piece to the puzzle. My question today focuses more on the business perspective and less on the technical solutions. Who can make it happen? What can we learn from the evolution of Location Based Services in general and Personal Navigation in particular? Read More

The Mobile Marketing Revolution and Location Intelligence – Seminar at Versailles

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Over 120 persons RSVP to the VBC event in Miami

I’ll post my comments here after the event.

If you had the opportunity to participate, I’ll appreciate your feedback. What do you see in this map now?

Thank you!

Claudio Schapsis

How location will enable milking more money from Social Networks

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Why is location changing the business of social networking? Because it is the missing link between virtual societies and the real world. Once I can identify the location of each member of my community, I can easily find ways to make money from it.

The value of Location

Location will open the door to a new level of hyper-targeting. Not only can I target customers who answer to a certain demographic profile, but I can do it based on their location, and I can predict their behavior based on past locations. I can be confident in sending an invitation to a football fan who is close to a sports bar, because I know he likes sports, there is a game and he is not at the stadium. I’ll also extend that invitation to the usual friends he meets on game days. Everyone wins — My users enjoy the opportunity to meet in a place and receive a discount; my customer (the bar) will pay me for having my users coming to their establishment. Read More

Location Based Services: The new mobile treasure map in Latin America

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

In the course of the past months I spoke many times with Monica Zlotogorski, Vice Chair, Latin American Advisory Board & Editor, “Inside Latin America“  TM Forum, and the topic and importance of location services in CALA came up several times. They  just published  my article about LBS in Latin America in their newsletter  (in Spanish) – Translation to follows.

For the full article please visit the TMF website Read More

Twitter and Maps – Locating your followers one tweet at a time

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Twitter announced the Geotagging API back in August and officially released it by the end of November Twitter applications like Birdfeed, Seesmic Web, Foursquare, Gowalla, Twidroid, Twittelator Pro already support this API.

Three weeks after of the official Geotagging API release I made a quick search looking for applications that use a combination of Twitter and maps. Note that these applications are not necessarily using the Geotagging API. My main interest was to find integrations of twitter and location/maps. SOME of the results are attached to the end of these notes. Note I didn’t try them or endorse here any of those applications. I hope you can leave a comment if you are using any of them. Read More

Location Based Services Technology with a Soul –Thanksgiving notes

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

There is a Rabbi Hillel aphorism that is always in my mind “If I am not for myself, who will be for me? But if I am only for myself, who am I? If not now, when?”

For a year now, we are exchanging ideas about LBS and business models. From my first post I insisted that the reason of putting a business together is to make a profit. Foursquare and Techies Give Back joined forces and elevated the “profit” concept into something more meaningful. They transform profit into Value for their Community.

On December 13th, they’re organizing NY Tech Gives Back on behalf of a non-profit called CampInteractive – which empowers inner-city youth through outdoor activities and tech workshops. It’s a day where people can give back to the community by volunteering and donating.

While there are many ways to get involved, they are looking for sponsors for the foursquare leaderboard to help raise money for the cause. I urge you to contact Simon or Adam at info@techiesgiveback.org to learn the details and how you can help.

Final Notes

Ec3:1 “… Everything has an appointed season, and there is a time for every matter under the heaven…” Spread the word, participate. This is the season to be for others. If not now, when???

Have a Happy Thanksgiving.

Indoor Navigation – The new gold rush? Part-1

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

The navigation ecosystem is changing rapidly. I’ve mentioned in previous posts the consequences of the commoditization of GPS devices. During the last two weeks, I had the opportunity to read many articles about how the navigation market is changing.

This is a time of WAR.

The New York Times published in October Stops and Starts of GPS Apps “… those portable devices [GARMIN TOMTOM etc] are under attack from a new source: the smartphone, and particularly Apple’s iPhone. The newest version of the iPhone’s operating system supports turn-by-turn navigation … Read More

Two events in the LBS industry I’ll attend and why you can’t miss them

Friday, September 11th, 2009

LBS LATAM – The First Location Based Services Conference for Latin America in Miami – 09/17 Miami, FL
Metaplaces – How to Monetize Location Data and Services 09/22-23 San Jose CA

Almost a year ago in my first post, I wrote that Location Based Services are the company’s effort to transform geographical positioning information into valuable and relevant data for a customer, to make a profit. Since then I had the opportunity to talk, work and advise leading companies in the industry regarding new products and services in the LBS arena.

LBS are very similar to other businesses in the sense that in order to succeed you need a solid revenue model and a clear value proposition. Sounds simple; but when approaching the LBS market and trying to understand the dynamics of its Value Chain the troubles begin. Many companies are getting this right and are already making profits. Others try to migrate WEB2.0 applications to the mobile world and discover later that in this environment “Free” is an expensive term. No wonder VCs usually look at maps as a feature and not something to build a whole application around.
Read More

Location in a Cloud – a Unique Approach to Provide Location-Related Information and Services

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

In one of my first posts, I noted that one of the main components of the LBS Value Chain is the ability to acquire and transport a user’s location and give access to that data to many service providers. Getting this information is, in many cases, expensive and presents obstacles to online service providers who would like to develop services based on mobile a user’s location. I was looking for the missing link between the mobile and the web world.

While there are many different approaches (and we might present some of those in the future), Xtify, a company based in New York City, caught my attention. They are creating a cloud of location information where authorized service providers can make available services using the location of their subscribers.

As usual, I was more interested in the business perspective of their operation. The following is a synopsis of my conversation with Josh Rochlin, CEO of Xtify.

I want to thank again Josh for his time and kindness to open up his business for us to learn. I believe many will have much to comment and say.
Follow up.

What is the difference between Xtify and other companies providing similar services?
We are currently the only company that is deriving location persistently from mobile devices and then building business rules around it. We source the location directly from the mobile device, rather than through the wireless carriers. This allows us to make location information available on a persistent and affordable basis.
Read More

Will Location Based Social Networks be like the restaurant business industry? Check their menu!

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

After the long weekend pass and I had the opportunity to summarize many of the emails and twitts received during the last weeks, I was surprised to still find new Location Based Social Networks coming to the market… not. This week I added to my List of Location Based Social NetworksMatch2blue, My Adventures, Snikkr , Mizoon, Nulaz , Toai , and Glympse.

I also found a few social networks closing or going through difficult times and struggling to survive. Then I remembered last Friday I was saddened to find one of my regular lunch places out of business. I just entered the Subway next door and had a sandwich. Today I found a “coming soon” sign at the same place.

Is there any parallel? Certainly there are LBSN for many tastes. There are gourmet types of Social Networks, others that appeal the masses, some that serve particular type of people, some are for dating, some are for business, some you need certain hardware to get in, and others that are by invitation only.

The fact is that in both cases the owners invest a considerable amount of money to get in, they dream to have fun and be unique, and in some cases they understand very little about the business model and end loosing all their savings.
Read More

On the quest for the 13.3 billion dollar Location Based Ecosystem.

Monday, April 27th, 2009

It has been a while since my last post. Launching a new product line was a tough and demanding task. Nevertheless the break gave me the time to look through a new perspective at the information I was putting together.

Almost 100 Location Based Social Networks after, we start to see the inevitable: consolidation and closings. More interesting, companies are trying to license the accumulated knowledge, without yet finding an appropriate business model to survive. We are still at the same starting point where developers struggle to understand how to migrate applications from Web2.0 environments to the mobile world.

To be or not to be
If we take a look back to my previous notes, one possible conclusion is that for an isolated company it’s almost impossible to succeed in this market. There are many obstacles that need to be solved even before they can try to implement the excellent idea that they have in mind. How are they going to get the location data? How to approach carriers minimizing fees? How to get information from mobile devices without GPS? How to overcome the difference of data between carriers, or even different handsets? and many other.

The good news is that location services are becoming a must. The question is how can we facilitate the go to market process of a carrier/handset agnostic solution without solving again the same problems other 100 companies already solved.

To aggregate or to facilitate that’s the question
In the beginning it was a map – latitude and longitude (a street map of Miami).
Now we add 5 restaurants in the block and by adding data or content to the map the result is Location Based Information.
Now we add context – 2 are Mexican restaurants, 2 are Italian and 1 is Chinese, all of them offer lunch and all close at 9PM. On top we add collaboration – reviews, recommendations, pictures, experiences, etc. now we have created value. If we can share that value and each one use it according to their needs and giving back to the system, we created Sustainable Location Based Intelligence.
We can extrapolate this to any other type of information; weather, news, traffic, advertising, 411, etc.

Now think of a platform that solves all your development and logistics problems, i.e. handsets OS, carrier fees, mapping interfaces and licenses, etc. In exchange you have to share your data, and benefit from other’s contributions. The key is participation and the challenge is to create an open platform where developers can craft on the fly partnerships, and help in building the functional building block that will put together that 13.3 billion dollar market that everybody is talking about. We can call it a Location Based Democracy.

Think of it as a solar system, where each one is moving in its own orbit, some have 1 or more moons revolving around, and all contribute to the mutual equilibrium. In business terms, creating this ecosystem will allow many companies to make a living, establishing micro-LBS-business around others without worrying about reinventing the wheel again and again rather unleashing the real value of “location base contextual valuable information”.

Give them the help and the technology to build cheap cars, and install toll booths
So why will somebody take the responsibility to create this? In the democracy of location based data somebody has to take the initiative to lead. Nobody wins from the chaos, and I believe it’s in everybody’s interest to keep it a “democracy”. It is a give and take game. So what are you ready to give away and what are the core assets you will keep for your company?
And at the end we come back again to the same question “What is the business model?” Is it revenue sharing? Is it success sharing? What is proper compensation for each party? Where is the money? In this case I’ll say “Take a closer look… It’s all over the map.”

Location Based Social Networks – Building a Framework of Best Practices for Appropriate Business Models that Makes Money

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

In November I started a list of Location Based Social Networks (LBSN) – and in my first post I wrote “The question is how many of those will be alive next year…” Sadly to say, today (February) I started to update the list with those that are already closing or on their way to close.

My answer then was simple, only those with a solid revenue model and clear value proposition will last. Let’s take a first look on what makes a solid revenue model and services that have clear differentiators.

Profit is the only objective. What is the reason we create a new service or put a company together? The only answer is “TO MAKE MONEY”. Any other reason you may think or find is secondary. The source of that money is your customer. The way to get that money (legally) is by providing them goods, services, and solutions. The products and services are not the objective of the company, they exist only as the conduit to get your customers money by providing them something valuable they need and that keeps them happy.

The Business Model IS the differentiator. I may sound extreme here, but what differentiate services and makes them successful is not technology, but their business model. Take a look at the (now) 80 Location Based Social Networks on my list. I don’t believe there is much technological difference between them. Bottom line, only those that will succeed to generate revenues will survive.

Marketing, Business Dev and Sales (MBDS) are a key part of your Business Model. Review the list of LBSN and continue with the following exercise. Cut and paste the message excerpts from their websites WITHOUT the name of the company. Read the document the day after and try to identify who is who. If you are one of the owners of those companies, I dare you to pass the list through your employees and see if they can pick their own company from the list. Close your eyes and imagine taking a goldfish from the water tank and leaving it on the table. That’s your company without MBDS.

Business Models are NOT cross-market portable. Many of the LBSN base their hopes in implementing successful WEB2.0 business models, ignoring that the WEB and Mobile environments are completely different. Messaging in the WEB is free but mobile text messaging cost money. WEB mail has no charge but pushing your email to your blackberry carries its own costs. Even Voice is free over the web (skype, jaxtr, etc) but that’s far from being the reality in the mobile world. Ignoring this and other differences result on a distorted view of customer acquisition costs and wrong operational expenditures estimations that lead to “…We had an amazing and unique technology but we run out of money…”

There are other components in the framework, and each one of the elements here presented has its own subcategories, questions and connectors. Want more info? Quid pro Quo, leave some feedback of value for me and the other readers (or just pay for it). As you may see blogging has also its own business mode :-)

Location Based Social Networks – Is Privacy Overrated? Rules for a New World

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

I’ve juggling with the idea of writing about location based social networking privacy issues for many weeks. From any side I tried to approach this issue I remained with more questions than answers.

I considered starting with the Fourth Amendment, even though GPS technology didn’t exist in 1791. Not entering into a legal discussion my first impression is that the emphasis here is on personal security. That’s when I remembered my first digital camera and my wife being terrified to put pictures of our kids on the web. It wasn’t about privacy, but about the reasonable expectancy of keeping our kids secure and avoiding people delving into our lives.

I believe this is the paradox of social networks in general and those based on location in particular. I want to make my information public but at the same time I want to keep the information secured (actually not the information but myself).

Looking over the other side of the table, the value of a social network resides on the information you provide. The lack of privacy is one of the pillars that sustain the business models of many, if not all, social networks. When privacy issues are raised, we usually ask what the companies are doing to protect their customers. Expecting the companies to protect your privacy is like expecting the cat to safeguard the cream; this is the fuel for their business. It’s not the companies that need to protect the information, rather YOU the customer.

I reviewed the privacy policies of more than 20 location based social networks and personal locator devices. I recommend you to do so before you start posting When and Where you are doing your What and with Whom. But if we separate the concepts of Privacy and Security, I don’t think the Location Based Social Networks companies are the problem. Technology is usually neutral, users aren’t.

Personally I don’t mind if a company, in exchange for a service, collects information about my habits, locations, and other details IF before using that information ALL personal identification is completely deleted AND is never used to sell something back to ME. The fact I’m a public person and I share information, is not an invitation to invade my space. My space is on invitation ONLY. Once we agree on this principle, we can start talking about other technological barrier and safeguard such as location acquisition and capture, location notification and accuracy, location information accessibility, location history control, location ownership, etc.

Today as in 1791 Privacy and Safety are really a concern and privacy advocates have a central role in corporate LBS

Without any doubt, the accessibility of GPS technology is leading us to new types of communities and services. People participate in a virtual world without borders; People are part of virtual societies, sometime bigger than the population of many countries. Maybe “We the People” needs to virtually govern ourselves and establish the new social conduct standards for a completely different world.

So, where do you stand?

More on Business Models for GPS navigation devices, Location Based Social Networking and RFID applications

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Sundays is usually posting day, today I’ll take a different approach.

I believe one of the most important results in a post is the readers’ comments. They enrich and bring new perspectives to the initial approach. Skipping over those comments and the exchange of ideas is like ordering a banana split and eating only the ice cream.

I would like to refer you to the readers’ contributions on my post on business models for navigation devices combined with social networking. There, new applications were exposed, a few questions remained unanswered (wireless guys, your input please), and there is an amazing exchange of observations on what is Presence Marketing – how to use it combined with Location Based Social Networks, the extension of RFID applications, and Privacy concerns (my next topic).

My remarks on CES and notes on the Privacy Factor on new business models can wait a day or two.

I encourage you to read the comments to the end and most important, leave yours.

I have nothing more to say but THANK YOU!

Press HERE for the post.

Four Marketing Executives on Location Based Technologies

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

I have the privilege of belonging to MENG, the Marketing Executive Networking Group. MENG is a national network of top-level marketing executives.
Last week I asked four senior marketing executives from the network how Location Based Services and Technologies will affect their practices.
Without more introduction, here are their shots.


— CONTINUE READING THIS POST —

Expert contributor profiles

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

Bucley Brinkman

Buckley Brinkman – Change Catalyst

Change Catalyst and Entrepreneurial Professional with diverse industry experience in both Service and Manufacturing environments. I bring out the best in organizations by galvanizing teams and creating a laser focus on results. My leadership focuses on bringing out the best in people from the board room to the front lines and aligning those abilities with the challenges in the marketplace. I am a true generalist with hands-on experience in Sales and Marketing, Operations, Customer Service, Accounting, and Executive Leadership.
Buckley is a member of MENG.

http://buckleybrinkman.com/

Peter Kemp

Peter Kemp

Peter Kemp – Managing Director, Old Greenwich Partners

Peter has a broad marketing background that gives him a unique perspective on growing revenue and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of sales and marketing organizations. He started OGP as a way to bring a fresh approach to marketing processes, which never seem to receive the same process improvement attention devoted to manufacturing or back office functions. His knowledge of how marketing and agencies operate, combined with experience across a wide variety of industries, gives him a unique perspective on on marketing strategy and operations that is creative, actionable and practical.
Peter is a member of MENG

OldGreenwichPartners.com

Jonathan Paisner

Jonathan Paisner

Jonathan Paisner – Founder and President, CityListen Audio Tours

Entrepreneurial executive with track record in building Fortune 500 brands, driving new initiatives, and developing strategic partnerships – with a particular focus in the media and hi-tech industries. Jonathan has worked extensively with a range of notable brands, including American Express, Fisher Scientific, Reader’s Digest and Cisco Systems. Earlier, Jonathan created and ran the licensing division of A&E Television Networks, building a successful business unit through the development of dozens of partnerships to extend A&E, Biography and The History Channel into publishing, travel, radio, music and interactive.
At CityListen he created a new kind of travel publishing company.They create and electronically publish audio walking tours that can be downloaded and played on any MP3 player.
Jonathan is a member of MENG

www.citylisten.com

Mike Wittenstein

Mike Wittenstein

Mike Wittenstein – Consulting Chief Experience Officer

Mike Wittenstein has been speaking and presenting on the customer experience throughout his professional life. Whether in a tight session with a brand team, one-on-one with Chief Experience Officers and Chief Marketing Officers, or the big meeting with the whole organization, he is always on his feet, leading his audience to understanding and insights that create customer experiences that bring customers — and their friends — back for more.
Mike speaks with the authority born of 20 years of leadership in marketing strategy and technology, and a lifetime devoted to the design and management of customer experiences that bond customers to brands.
Mike is a member of MENG

http://www.mikewittenstein.com/

Another Location Based Services – Social Networking Business Model – Old meet Web2.0

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

This article presents an additional business model associated with a Location Based Social Network, this time applied to a mature market – your automobile GPS devices and fleet management.

— CONTINUE READING THIS POST —

My list of Location Based Social Networking sites

Saturday, December 20th, 2008

I compiled a list of Location Based Social Networks I visited while researching for my previous posts. Per request of many readers I’m posting the list in a separate page.

The general impression I had after putting all of them together in one page, is that many of the LBSN are “me too” applications, and at this point I can’t pinpoint one that present a marketing message with a unique offer, a distinctive value proposition or main differentiators from the others. I included standalone sites, and applications that complement as add-on Social Networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Flicker, YouTube, etc.

The directory is provided as “info only” without recommendations or endorsements. I’ll appreciate though, if you can review the list, and leave your comments.

The page is dated December 20, 2008. It would be interesting to review it in one year time and see if it grew, shrunk or consolidated.

For the list PRESS HERE or press the LBSN Links button in the top menu.

Please leave your comments, and Link/share/quote/ping. For additional posted comments follow this link

Thank you for your support!

Location Based Services Value Chain – Part 3 – Business Models for Location Based Social Networking

Monday, December 15th, 2008

From conversations I had with friends and colleagues, I believe this will be the first of a series of “last parts” regarding business models for Mobile Location Based Services.

I’ll assume through this post that you have read the preceding articles (LBS Marketing Concept / Value Chain 1 / Value Chain 2 / Location Based Social Networks 2.5) as many of the keys for further business models discussions reside there.

In my first post I defined the “Location Based Service concept” as the company’s effort to transform geographical positioning information into valuable and relevant data for a customer, to make a profit. The question here is: who is the customer that is willing to pay for that data?

Tim O’Reilly defines in “What is WEB 2.0Data is the next Intel Inside and he presents a key question: Who owns the data? And I would add, What Data?

In the following Business Model the LBS service provider owns the data. I reviewed many Location Based Social Networking sites and in most cases “some kind” of lack of privacy is the base of their business model. Differently from carrier fee based pushed services (top – down), this model is based on bottom-up. The LBS provider enables a platform for people to interact for free. In this scenario the handset is usually subsidized by the carrier, interested in generating traffic. The free service is now growing in viral mode and at this point the customers should be called by their real function: “data collectors”.



— CONTINUE READING THIS POST —