Almost 100 Location Based Social Networks after, we start to see the inevitable: consolidation and closings. More interesting, companies are trying to license the accumulated knowledge, without yet finding an appropriate business model to survive. We are still at the same starting point where developers struggle to understand how to migrate applications from Web2.0 environments to the mobile world.
To be or not to be
If we take a look back to my previous notes, one possible conclusion is that for an isolated company it’s almost impossible to succeed in this market. There are many obstacles that need to be solved even before they can try to implement the excellent idea that they have in mind. How are they going to get the location data? How to approach carriers minimizing fees? How to get information from mobile devices without GPS? How to overcome the difference of data between carriers, or even different handsets? and many other.
The good news is that location services are becoming a must. The question is how can we facilitate the go to market process of a carrier/handset agnostic solution without solving again the same problems other 100 companies already solved.
To aggregate or to facilitate that’s the question
In the beginning it was a map – latitude and longitude (a street map of Miami).
Now we add 5 restaurants in the block and by adding data or content to the map the result is Location Based Information.
Now we add context – 2 are Mexican restaurants, 2 are Italian and 1 is Chinese, all of them offer lunch and all close at 9PM. On top we add collaboration – reviews, recommendations, pictures, experiences, etc. now we have created value. If we can share that value and each one use it according to their needs and giving back to the system, we created Sustainable Location Based Intelligence.
We can extrapolate this to any other type of information; weather, news, traffic, advertising, 411, etc.
Now think of a platform that solves all your development and logistics problems, i.e. handsets OS, carrier fees, mapping interfaces and licenses, etc. In exchange you have to share your data, and benefit from other’s contributions. The key is participation and the challenge is to create an open platform where developers can craft on the fly partnerships, and help in building the functional building block that will put together that 13.3 billion dollar market that everybody is talking about. We can call it a Location Based Democracy.
Think of it as a solar system, where each one is moving in its own orbit, some have 1 or more moons revolving around, and all contribute to the mutual equilibrium. In business terms, creating this ecosystem will allow many companies to make a living, establishing micro-LBS-business around others without worrying about reinventing the wheel again and again rather unleashing the real value of “location base contextual valuable information”.
Give them the help and the technology to build cheap cars, and install toll booths
So why will somebody take the responsibility to create this? In the democracy of location based data somebody has to take the initiative to lead. Nobody wins from the chaos, and I believe it’s in everybody’s interest to keep it a “democracy”. It is a give and take game. So what are you ready to give away and what are the core assets you will keep for your company?
And at the end we come back again to the same question “What is the business model?” Is it revenue sharing? Is it success sharing? What is proper compensation for each party? Where is the money? In this case I’ll say “Take a closer look… It’s all over the map.”


5 Comments
Comment by Benjamin — April 27, 2009 @ 12:08 pm
Is it what Artilium (http://artilium.co.uk/) is doing?
Does other companies do this?
A short description : The Company’s ARTA Mobile Applications Platform opens mobile telecoms networks to third-party applications and connected social media, generating a new value-chain that includes advertisers, content providers, Internet service providers, social networks, mobile network operators, and software developers.
Comment by Christopher S. Rollyson — April 28, 2009 @ 11:37 pm
LBS_PRO, thanks for a brief description of what is, I think, an actionable vision, even though I have limited knowledge of this area. Can you add to it by offering an analysis of potential adoption bottlenecks (i.e. the U.S. carriers’ stranglehold on innovation makes it an unlikely place for early adoption), and where innovators might best focus their energies to make this a reality? Is this an area where “emerging markets” might have special opportunities due to their (relative) lack of legacy infrastructure? Thanks for an interesting post!
Comment by Olivier — April 29, 2009 @ 4:24 pm
Interesting article. I do agree – it should not only be a “democracy” but as well “neutral”, kind of a “Switzerland” of the carrier locations.
AirSage has such an approach (www.airsage.com) if I understood this correctly. Check out their video on youtube – there are many things that can be done with “locations”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2YKlxmvLGs
Comment by L. Howell — May 6, 2009 @ 9:26 pm
I had a conversation about a mobile information service and shared the business model. Her response was “I prefer free services” and thus therein lies the opportunity? The “free” game is dying a slow death. Here’s why: it is not sustainable and is ultimately not a legitimate business by using so-called advertising as the primary source of revenue. There are some specific industries that could benefit where customers have stated plainly that they are willing to pay. More on this later. But the whole notion of “free” not to mention the over 100 LBS services, which might also be called “location BS” because I don’t know enough people in my age group +40 who will sign up and update their location so I can determine if my buddy Mike is at the golf range or not. I simply place a call to him.
But here’s the deal, most entrepreneurs miss serious, high volume business opportunities because they don’t perceive it to be sexy enough or interesting. There are 4-5 solid business models with real revenue that is repeatable. If you want to know more about these vibrant and profitable biz models, feel free to call me at 281-728-5842
Comment by Helge Staedtler — June 3, 2009 @ 4:36 am
I strongly agree with L. Howell in that earnings from advertising alone may not be a sustainable revenue model for any LBS out there. There has to be a diversified mix of sources.
I think it would be the perfect test for any businessmodel out there if it stands the test for bullet proof’ness in asking “Where does the money come from, when ads are not an option?”
The LBS out there having a valid answer to this, will profit in the long run. I believe in value for the customer at first an in value for the advertisers second.
There are several interesting models of how to generate real value from and with LBS for customers. But its a hard time at the moment (credit crisis) to get anyone to invest in anything that contains LBS even in homeopathic doses because the buzzword has been burnt long ago IMHO.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment