Have you read PART 1? I’ll strongly recommend reading part 1 first.
As mentioned in part 1 the main components in the LBS Value Chain are: the location based service provider or developer (LBS APP), the data carrier (a cellular provider like T-Mobile, AT&T, etc), and the customer.
As Part 3 will talk about Web 2.0 strategies for Location Based Services and particularly for Location Based Social Networking, we need to completely understand every piece of the puzzle. Otherwise your model will be leaking money (pouring in some cases). Moreover understanding the players and trends will allow you to craft long term solid strategies.
A more comprehensive value chain shall include:
MAPS: Most LBS applications utilize maps; therefore their cost shall be added to the equation. The map market can be considered a duopoly dominated by Navteq and Teleatlas.
Consider: those companies were acquired recently by Nokia and TomTom.
Ask: How can they affect your business by controlling the LBS market. Can your application change the map provider easily? Do they cover all the areas you plan to service? Can you grow to other markets (internationally)? Does your international strategy fit your provider’s existing maps? What are their plans of expansion? How are you getting charged? What layers of information are included in that charge? The list of questions doesn’t end here and is closely related on the type of service you are planning to offer.
MAP INTERFACES: If you want to use map providers like Navteq and TeleAtlas you will need to pay a premium price to companies that provide interfaces to those maps – such as Autodesk, Decarta, etc. Your applications can also be based on Google maps (TeleAtlas data) or Microsoft maps (Navteq data) API’s.
Consider: 1) This factor is almost unavoidable and in some cases the API selection will link you to a specific map provider. 2) While is true you can freely use Google and Microsoft interfaces, bear in mind you will need to pay them for the use of the maps when you start making money.
Ask: What is the price structure? Is the payment per map? Are you getting charged for each customer you serve? (oh yes, you do). Can your API support other map providers? Can you add your own maps? How much will cost to add specific regions? Do the charges include Points of Interest? Does the price include point to point routing capabilities? Can you provide PSAP information? What platforms do you support? How will you display information in different types of cellular phones?
Remember that once your development is committed to one of these platforms, it will be expensive to migrate to other. Again I strongly recommend checking their pricing structure. Most start for free but you will “pay the price” later.
M2M PROVIDER: In most cell phone based services, the communication costs are paid by the customer (SMS or IP-Data). If your service is based in a specific device (like a pet tracker) you will need to include a cellular operator or aggregator to fulfill the mobile communication. You will probably use a GSM provider and your device will include a SIM Card. Those carriers are known as Machine to Machine providers (M2M). Today the M is interpreted in many ways – Man-to-Machine, Machine-to-Man, Machine-to-Mobile, Mobile-to-Mobile, Mobile-to-Machine, etc. Usually M2M providers are small mobile operators with roaming agreements and/or mobile resellers/aggregators with services provided in the background by companies like AT&T, Telefonica, T-Mobile, Verizon, Vodafone, etc (Big Carriers).
Companies that fall in the M2M category are Jasper Wireless, Kore Telematics, Wyless and many others. As these companies usually buy large quantity of network capacity, or have roaming agreements, the solution you will get is usually better, more focused and cheaper than approaching directly the Big Carriers. Moreover, many Big Carriers require particular certifications, and with these M2M providers, the process is usually transparent.
Consider: 1) Choosing a M2M provider is a long term commitment. Imagine you have thousands of devices in the market and you need to recall them to change their SIM card (I don’t think so…) 2) You can use SMS and/or Data transmissions (TCP / UDP). Each one has pros and cons. Just remember to use the * symbol in excel you will be amazed with the numbers. For example, if your model is based on SMS (let’s say $0.08 per SMS), and you have just 5000 units, reporting every 5 minutes half day; your annually bill will be more than $20,000,000 (yes, twenty million). Is your projected income covering that?
Ask: What is the price structure? Do you have a minimum volume commitment? Can data (or SMS) be pulled? If using data, what is the rounding per session? Do you provide VPN services? Will your device have a fixed IP address? Do you have an activation portal/API? Do you charge activation fees? If SMS, do you provide SMPP gateway services? Do Mobile Originated and Mobile Terminated messages have different prices? What type of certification do you require (FCC, PTCRB, EC, etc)? Does your service require non standard certifications (particular of a Big Carrier?) Do you provide roaming? How much will you pay for roaming? Where do you roam? Can you permanently roam?
GPS ENABLED DEVICE: Now you need to write the application. If your service is not installed in a cellular phone, you will need to provide your customers with a device with GPS and mobile communications capabilities i.e. most Personal Locator Devices (PLD). This is a topic by itself and I’ll devote a different post for it.
Bottom Line: The sum of all those expenses + YOUR PROFIT is what the customer usually will pay for some Value Service. This is your Average Revenue Per Unit (ARPU) or your Customer Acquisition Cost depending on the business model you choose (see part 1). If your customers are reluctant to pay your fees, or your investors consider the burning cost and risks associated too high, most probably you have done something wrong along the way.
Having almost all the components clear, I’ll elaborate on part 3 on Location Based Services business models based on Web 2.0 strategies particularly free Location Based Social Networking and their specific value chain.
TO THE READER: as my list of considerations and questions is limited for readability I’ll appreciate your comments, particularly on:
What else would you recommend to consider for each category?
What else would you recommend to ask to the providers in each category?
Thank you again!





10 Comments
Comment by Dan McDuffie — December 4, 2008 @ 9:51 pm
I like how you rightly classify companies like Wyless/Kore/Jasper as ‘M2M Operator’ separately to ‘Mobile Operator’, and not use the MVNO/Mobile Aggregator misnomer as it’s an important distinction. The fact remains that the mobile operators themselves are not well positioned to service the intricate needs of the M2M mobile ASP industry, especially with regards to subscriber management, billing, real time data monitoring/alarming and cost effective global roaming capabilities. It’s why we (Wyless, in my case) like to think of ourselves as ‘Enablers’ rather than ‘Aggregators/MVNO’s.’ Our model is rapidly moving towards one of software/services supporting the mobile data component of the value chain, and that’s proving to be a key piece of the puzzle.
So, thanks for your deep understanding of the market, and for spreading the word!
Dan McDuffie
Wyless
Comment by Jeroen van Bemmel — December 5, 2008 @ 6:26 pm
Hi,
Some comments:
- Have you considered the impact of “open source” maps: http://www.openstreetmap.org/ It is user generated content, free to use
- You made some nice pictures of the value chain, as seen from the business perspective. What about the value from the user perspective, what are the users (willing to) paying for?
Regards,
Jeroen
Comment by Jeroen van Bemmel — December 5, 2008 @ 6:38 pm
I’d argue that LBS aren’t (only) about maps, although most people do associate the two.
Maps are useful for navigation services. Personal navigation devices like TomTom’s are very popular, and have contributed to the mass market adoption of the concept of LBS. However, there are many useful LBS that don’t involve any maps at all. A simple example is putting the name of the nearest city you are (or have been) in on your blog.
Second, LBS aren’t necessarily about GPS either. GPS provides high accuracy which is required for certain classes of LBS, but the cost to provide it is also fairly high, it doesn’t work in all environments, and fixes take too long for some applications. From a mobile operator perspective, cell-id based LBS can be interesting, also because the mobile network is a sunk investment
Comment by Yukon Palmer — December 8, 2008 @ 10:57 am
I think you cover the details for the data services and mapping well. However, in my experience the application side is the most challenging. The “enablers” such as Jasper, Wyless, etc. and the map providers like Google have reduced a lot of barriers to entry for LBS providers. However, they are the least difficult components in the equation.
In the M2M world the application requires a web or client app, a listener (component that accepts messages from the mobile device, deciphers it and inserts it into the database), a database, and all of the required hardware (servers, routers, etc).
While many junior and senior software engineers have experience with coding for web and client applications and building & managing databases, few have experience with wireless. In our years, we have found many that can create apps, access API’s, and build the DB. Relatively few had any knowledge of how to interact with wireless devices.
I’m sure that people with the necessary skill set will become more commonplace as the LBS market grows. However, in my experience this has been the biggest challenge so far.
Yukon Palmer
Field Technologies
http://www.fieldtechnologies.com
Comment by Claudio Schapsis — December 8, 2008 @ 11:09 pm
Yukon,
I agree with you, I know how hard it is to find the qualified people that understand how a SMPP gateway works and how to implement one, how to wake-up a device in TCP mode, or how to implement the right network infrastructure.
I tried to focus on the external business aspects and assume that anybody that invest in developing this type of applications will have the basic core competences.
As you said, this is one of the biggest (internal) challenges, and without it, don’t even try. It would be like investing your money in a restaurant without having a professional chef.
Pingback by Business Models for Location Based Social Networking | Location Based Services Unveiled — December 15, 2008 @ 2:24 pm
[...] this post that you have read the preceding articles (LBS Marketing Concept / Value Chain 1 / Value Chain 2 / Location Based Social Networks 2.5) as many of the keys for further business models discussions [...]
Comment by Aneesh — January 15, 2009 @ 1:23 am
I have to agree with Jeroen. LBS is not about Maps or GPS. My views about LBS is more about serving information to user- irrestive of his access medium (computer/mobile or any other gadget) which is in context to a particular location. Now this location can be his own location- which either he defines or an LBS application acquire through GPS/cell ID traingularization. Its more about location of user’s interest.
The most important question for future applications is- how many gadgets will a user carry with him? GPS, PND, Mobile etc. I still remember reading about a study that claims mobile as the most pers gadget and there are people who sleeps with their mobile (So do I). I wonder how these value chain players plan to offer LBS services which sits inside the mobie gadget and handles the complex UI environment of the mobile devices.
Lastly, when do we see LBS moving from utility to entertainment? I believe for most of the markets its still used for offering contextual utility services.
Pingback by Location in a Cloud - a Unique Approach to Provide Location-Related Information and Services | Location Based Services - Business Only — August 27, 2009 @ 1:05 pm
[...] one of my first posts, I noted that one of the main components of the LBS Value Chain is the ability to acquire and transport a user’s location and give access to that data to many [...]
Pingback by Tattletech » Blog Archive » Tattletech Hot Seat with Claudio Schapsis, LBS Guru — October 6, 2009 @ 8:18 am
[...] right business models that can serve everybody (see some of my articles about Value Chain here <http://bdnooz.com/2008/11/28/location-based-services-value-chain-part-2/> [...]
Pingback by Business Models for Location Based Social Networking | Georillas 800 LBS Marketing — August 24, 2011 @ 7:08 pm
[...] this post that you have read the preceding articles (LBS Marketing Concept / Value Chain 1 / Value Chain 2 / Location Based Social Networks 2.5) as many of the keys for further business models discussions [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment